Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Radley

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Radley

    Does he have anything to worry about? I was at the game and didn't notice it and haven't seen a replay yet?

  • #2
    I don’t believe so.
    FVCK CANCER

    Comment


    • #3
      God no....it was a gentle round the lower leg tackle. Not even a penalty.

      Comment


      • #4
        i've noticed Joe was already holding his knees in previous plays so it was already injured before Radley's tackle.

        Comment


        • #5
          How was it even a penalty? Nothing to worry about at all

          Comment


          • #6
            They'll find a reason.
            1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
            1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.

            Comment


            • #7
              If he gets suspended for that it would be a joke.
              his target zone will have to be between the hips and the first rib so he doesnt get into strife....

              Comment


              • #8
                Nope, nothing in it.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The match charges have come out and Victor wasn't even sighted. The right result.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Sweet

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bondicigar View Post
                      If he gets suspended for that it would be a joke.
                      his target zone will have to be between the hips and the first rib so he doesnt get into strife....
                      Future concussions anyone?
                      FVCK CANCER

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Website just confirmed he has been charged - thankfully it's just a fine

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I just looked at the replay - Cummins stops play at the end of tigers set and puts Victor on report for a third man in tackle that didn't happen even in that set but in the previous set the tigers had the ball 18 tackles prior - so strange

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by The Lip View Post
                            I just looked at the replay - Cummins stops play at the end of tigers set and puts Victor on report for a third man in tackle that didn't happen even in that set but in the previous set the tigers had the ball 18 tackles prior - so strange
                            Would have been a bunker review, means if the Tigers player actually was injured from the foul play they would be entitled to a free interchange.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post

                              Would have been a bunker review, means if the Tigers player actually was injured from the foul play they would be entitled to a free interchange.
                              Not anymore. They changed the rule this year so you only get a free interchange for a sin bin or send off

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X