Tweet
Originally posted by roostermcgregor
View Post
Random Rooster,
You are a well trained keyboard warrior who copies other peoples quotes and then gives his expert opinion on why they are wrong.
You are brilliant, but I was being respectful in the last post , and said I see things my way , & you see it yours.
But seeing you are such a pr*ck about it all, and that you need to always be right, here is my responses:
i) Yes- it was all premeditated by Souffs.
If you don't think it was Souffs, then it must have been premeditated by the Roosters. But hold on, Robinson doesn't premeditate foul play.
If it wasn't Souffs who started the chaos, and it wasn't the Roosters, who is to blame for the debacle on Sunday?
I know, it was the fairy godmother of course- do you know her?
ii) Hit us with illegal shots and hurt the players - no one was hurt except Teddy..
Teddy was hit with a high shot and could not pass a concussion test - he was completely out of it.
That's what high shots do - they cause damage.
If you do not think the other high shots did not do any damage to players you have no idea.
Why don't you ask any current football player whether a high shot affects them?.
Oh , thats right , you have never played football.
If you want me to demonstrate, I 'll happily invite you to a local park, and if you want to run the ball at me, I'll hit you with a coathanger..
I will guarantee that for the next 3 hours you will resemble a drunk who has been at the pub all night.
Guaranteed.
iii) Maybe you don't know what "come to daddy" means. Yes it means just that. Its been that way for a few years now with Souffs, & the Roosters, and they are definitely are the Daddy..They have the better of us results wise , and physical dominance. You appear to be a person who doesn't want to know this, or is in denial.
iv) Keary traumatised in the presser - I am being dramatic.
Why don't you ask Keary? Was he out of it because he lost a football match, or was he out of it because of the manner in which the football game was won/ lost?
v) Full strength side is going to beat Souffs . Again, you have completely missed my point. When Souffs hit you with the high shots & hospitalise Manu, and retire Teddy from the game, how many of your "full strength side " are going to be on the field to win you your game? Answer- it ain't going to be there.- what you envisaged with your starting side isn't going to be there during the game.
I understand that legitimate injuries to Chrihton and Toops contributed to Sunday's loss, but do you really think that the shot on Manu breaking his face was accidental? I know a lot of you pacifist types would really like to think so. Also, the illegal high shots on Sunday were completely accidental from Souffs , & had no effect on the Roosters ? (here's your pacifist side coming out again) - if you believe that, you are making me laugh. I really think that watching contact sports is not for you & you are better off watching non- contact sports- maybe marbles?
You are a well trained keyboard warrior who copies other peoples quotes and then gives his expert opinion on why they are wrong.
You are brilliant, but I was being respectful in the last post , and said I see things my way , & you see it yours.
But seeing you are such a pr*ck about it all, and that you need to always be right, here is my responses:
i) Yes- it was all premeditated by Souffs.
If you don't think it was Souffs, then it must have been premeditated by the Roosters. But hold on, Robinson doesn't premeditate foul play.
If it wasn't Souffs who started the chaos, and it wasn't the Roosters, who is to blame for the debacle on Sunday?
I know, it was the fairy godmother of course- do you know her?
ii) Hit us with illegal shots and hurt the players - no one was hurt except Teddy..
Teddy was hit with a high shot and could not pass a concussion test - he was completely out of it.
That's what high shots do - they cause damage.
If you do not think the other high shots did not do any damage to players you have no idea.
Why don't you ask any current football player whether a high shot affects them?.
Oh , thats right , you have never played football.
If you want me to demonstrate, I 'll happily invite you to a local park, and if you want to run the ball at me, I'll hit you with a coathanger..
I will guarantee that for the next 3 hours you will resemble a drunk who has been at the pub all night.
Guaranteed.
iii) Maybe you don't know what "come to daddy" means. Yes it means just that. Its been that way for a few years now with Souffs, & the Roosters, and they are definitely are the Daddy..They have the better of us results wise , and physical dominance. You appear to be a person who doesn't want to know this, or is in denial.
iv) Keary traumatised in the presser - I am being dramatic.
Why don't you ask Keary? Was he out of it because he lost a football match, or was he out of it because of the manner in which the football game was won/ lost?
v) Full strength side is going to beat Souffs . Again, you have completely missed my point. When Souffs hit you with the high shots & hospitalise Manu, and retire Teddy from the game, how many of your "full strength side " are going to be on the field to win you your game? Answer- it ain't going to be there.- what you envisaged with your starting side isn't going to be there during the game.
I understand that legitimate injuries to Chrihton and Toops contributed to Sunday's loss, but do you really think that the shot on Manu breaking his face was accidental? I know a lot of you pacifist types would really like to think so. Also, the illegal high shots on Sunday were completely accidental from Souffs , & had no effect on the Roosters ? (here's your pacifist side coming out again) - if you believe that, you are making me laugh. I really think that watching contact sports is not for you & you are better off watching non- contact sports- maybe marbles?
Comment