Tweet
Why did we let go of Jamie Soward again?? 
!!
!!
-
-
Soward was not needed nor would we have been better off with him..Originally posted by Geohood View PostWhy did we let go of Jamie Soward again??!!
Whereas Linnett was a decent option as we are a little thin in the centres,but then again if the Cowboys offered him big money then that kind of explains it!Comment
-
What about big willie? Why did we let him go? He really liked the eastern suburbs.Comment
-
Gold! Gold! Gold!Originally posted by Geohood View PostWhy did we let go of Jamie Soward again??!!
And cause we CANNOT keep everyone. Would rather have hung onto Tamou.Comment
-
Why did we let Jeff Orford go?
Oh yeah, to get Andrew Walker.Comment
-
No, why did we let DaFunchy go???
Cos Melon said.
The FlogPen .
You know it makes sense.Comment
-
Why did we let Shackleton go???!!!
Comment
-
Would you have him back, because it's very likely that Parra will not re-sign him at the end of this year????Originally posted by Geohood View PostWhy did we let Shackleton go???!!!Comment
-
Why did we let go of anasta for..............,...lol jkComment
-
Should have kept him , showing some good signs of big things to come" A man can only walk as far as he can see"Comment
-
We have skd who id prefer and also mago comming who could be the next big thing so who cares about linnetComment
-
^^^^^^^^^Opps i ment moga lolComment
-
should'v kept shillington for a lil bit longer... I'd rather have who we got now tho
go Easts
Is that the full story,
or is your news limited?Comment
-
We let him go cause he apparantly got offered 220-230k which is MASSIVE overs for an ordinary centre (imo). It would've been stupid to go anywhere near that amount, he's a 150k max player imo.
Comment
-
He is pretty slow. No big loss at all.Comment
Comment