Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The filth at it again !!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by King Salvo View Post
    It is still an allegation at this stage pending further tests but he was driving on a suspended licence.
    Yeh thanks we can all read.

    Another pointless comment brought to you by The Queen….

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Thirteen View Post

      Yeh thanks we can all read.

      Another pointless comment brought to you by The Queen….
      I doubt that you had any real education at all as you are very IQ challenged to say the least as people with similar views as a dumbo like you only went to primary school for a few years.

      You couldn't even finish grade 6 after 12 years of Schooling - repeated kindergarten 3 times I hear

      If dumb and dumber was to be remade as a movie you could play both roles as you are sooooooooooooooooo dumb

      Dino Bof Dumbo Misogynistic twats like you are just about extinct and thankfully so.

      Your Family must be embarrassed to have the same surname

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by King Salvo View Post

        I doubt that you had any real education at all as you are very IQ challenged to say the least as people with similar views as a dumbo like you only went to primary school for a few years.

        You couldn't even finish grade 6 after 12 years of Schooling - repeated kindergarten 3 times I hear

        If dumb and dumber was to be remade as a movie you could play both roles as you are sooooooooooooooooo dumb

        Dino Bof Dumbo Misogynistic twats like you are just about extinct and thankfully so.

        Your Family must be embarrassed to have the same surname
        Just goes to show how little you do know. If you can’t handle a bit of banter then get off the site.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Thirteen View Post

          Just goes to show how little you do know. If you can’t handle a bit of banter then get off the site.
          ...

          Originally posted by Thirteen View Post
          Another pointless comment brought to you by The Queen….
          Mate there's 'banter' and then there's 13 getting all rude/personal when somebody corrects him. Stop being unpleasant.

          Comment


          • #20
            the story on the news said " former souffs player" when t should have said "souffs assistant coach and former player" blah blah blah.
            1911 1912 1913 1923 1935 1936 1937 1940 1945 1974 1975 2002 2013 2018 2019 2020

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by ism22 View Post

              ...



              Mate there's 'banter' and then there's 13 getting all rude/personal when somebody corrects him. Stop being unpleasant.
              It’s great to finally see some support for our Queen. Well done ISM.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by roosterproud View Post
                the story on the news said " former souffs player" when t should have said "souffs assistant coach and former player" blah blah blah.
                Souths will be proud of him. They’ll offer him an extension. He represents what Souths culture is all about.

                I heard a disgraceful story about Tom Burgess the other day. Don’t know if it will ever get to the media but gee these brothers are a feral bunch.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Interesting how, obviously on advice from his lawyers, he went and undertook some sort of independent drug test the following day, which surprise surprise, came up clean. I'd bet that test did not involve Sam being observed urinating into the cup, and that he simply provided a urine sample belonging to someone else.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Batemans Bay Rooster View Post
                    Interesting how, obviously on advice from his lawyers, he went and undertook some sort of independent drug test the following day, which surprise surprise, came up clean. I'd bet that test did not involve Sam being observed urinating into the cup, and that he simply provided a urine sample belonging to someone else.
                    Any independent test would be inadmissible in court. As a previous poster said probably conducted in south’s junior car park by the club doctor.

                    When a person is surrounded by enablers, they begin to believe that they can get away with anything.

                    With the path Burgess is on, there will be a point in the future where even souths won’t be able to protect him anymore.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Tennessee Tornado View Post

                      Any independent test would be inadmissible in court. As a previous poster said probably conducted in south’s junior car park by the club doctor.

                      When a person is surrounded by enablers, they begin to believe that they can get away with anything.

                      With the path Burgess is on, there will be a point in the future where even souths won’t be able to protect him anymore.
                      His lawyers wouldn't advise him to get one for no reason. There is still a bit of conjecture around some of the details associated with roadside drug tests and their reliability/legality. Maybe all the lawyers need to do is create some doubt.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Batemans Bay Rooster View Post

                        His lawyers wouldn't advise him to get one for no reason. There is still a bit of conjecture around some of the details associated with roadside drug tests and their reliability/legality. Maybe all the lawyers need to do is create some doubt.
                        It is all about deflecting the media. Trying to make it a non story. He’s made a statement of innocence knowing full well it can’t be responded to.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by King Salvo View Post

                          I doubt that you had any real education at all as you are very IQ challenged to say the least as people with similar views as a dumbo like you only went to primary school for a few years.

                          You couldn't even finish grade 6 after 12 years of Schooling - repeated kindergarten 3 times I hear

                          If dumb and dumber was to be remade as a movie you could play both roles as you are sooooooooooooooooo dumb

                          Dino Bof Dumbo Misogynistic twats like you are just about extinct and thankfully so.

                          Your Family must be embarrassed to have the same surname
                          C'mon Salvo, it's Christmas. Where's your love for your fellow man.

                          Tis the season to be jolly. You two could exchange secret Santa gifts to make up.

                          Your correct, it's only alleged at this stage & procedures need to be followed but these alleged charges look very similar to recent earlier ones which have to raise eyebrows.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            As I say on another thread this looks very much like a vendetta by powerful mates of the father in law. On appeal, Sammy was exonerated and the judge was unflattering re the evidence of the former wife and the dad whose elisting of media mates was particularly frowned upon. For his part, Dewsbury has strenuously denied the charges and has sought independent blood test analysis. He has a career at stake.

                            Part of the earlier trial evidence was the old snob's threat to "destroy" Dewsbury and that's what seems to be happening. All over a harmless dick pic.

                            We need to reach out to Sam on this one, it's class war.
                            Last edited by Paddo Colt 61; 12-24-2022, 07:16 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Ive always rated Sammy boy & I like him but he's got to get through his thick head that if he wants to have a snort & Ive done it so Im not going to carve him up but he has to learn to catch a taxi or an Uber.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Paddo Colt 61 View Post
                                As I say on another thread this looks very much like a vendetta by powerful mates of the father in law. On appeal, Sammy was exonerated and the judge was unflattering re the evidence of the former wife and the dad whose elisting of media mates was particularly frowned upon. For his part, Dewsbury has strenuously denied the charges and has sought independent blood test analysis. He has a career at stake.

                                Part of the earlier trial evidence was the old snob's threat to "destroy" Dewsbury and that's what seems to be happening. All over a harmless dick pic.

                                We need to reach out to Sam on this one, it's class war.
                                Not sure if your taking the piss or not but lets play along. He's no angel or pin up boy.

                                What was exactly exonerated? The threats to the father in law inside the house? Didn't he plead guilty to everything else?

                                I'm sure all wives who find their husbands D##k pics on other women's phones find it hilarious. Pretty sure the recipient also didn't ask for those pics.

                                Apart from all that & also these new allegations I would definitely have Sammy as an Australian of the year candidate.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X