If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
But Hutch can cover more positions while Turpin is really only a nine.
He is not doing much of a job covering in the centers. God knows how he would go covering on the wing i know how that would turn out and it would be not very well for the chooks. i never want to see him at fullback if Hutch was to run our wearing the number 1 were screwed. He can't play in the middle or as an edge forward in fact I'm struggling to find a spot that hutch can cover in a first grade rugby league side he didn't go too well at hooker the other night. This bloke is nowhere as good as Auberon who i believe should have played rep footy. Jeez i hope watson can get back soon.
But Hutch can cover more positions while Turpin is really only a nine.
True, Hutch can cover all positions on the field, none of them well.
Seriously, he is a liability which is being exploited, he is the weakest link,
I think he not only stuffs up whatever position he plays, but he's like a virus, he weakens the positions around him by making them second guess their own roll.
You would think so but Connor played best when he was used as a prop in the middle last year.
I fully expect
14. Hutch
14.Watson
Two utilities on the bench ??? ... I don't see the point because Connor can cover dummy-half, lock and even in the halves, so he's just as versatile as Hutch and offers those positions coverage with more speed/X factor. He'd also be ok to slot in to the backs as well if needed (where I think he could probably do a better job than Hutch, as well - in my opinion)
Last week Keary and Walker were just so impotent. Their kicking games were ****ing horrible. It seems like Walker needs a bigger body and boot in his halves partner.
Comment