Refs, commentators, and tactics

[Guest]

Its just that the 50/50 calls go against us more than 90% of the time.

As for which penalties wernt warranted i'd have to watch the game again, but know there was a few. As has been said repeatadly its more the penalties we dont get (and there was a few of those last night) that pisses everyone off.

And again "do you really think we were more than twice as ill disciplined as lol@souffs.??" As for what constitutes you being off your head, almost every time you post on here you prove that.

we always notice the 50/50 calls that go against us, but what about the 50/50 calls that go our way?
Before Maloney's second try, he was technically tackle as he had his elbow on the ground and a souths player had his hand on him simultaneously, that constitutes a tackle, but the ref called play on, Maloney got up, scored, and we went on to win.

[kurtsherlock6]

we always notice the 50/50 calls that go against us, but what about the 50/50 calls that go our way?
Before Maloney's second try, he was technically tackle as he had his elbow on the ground and a souths player had his hand on him simultaneously, that constitutes a tackle, but the ref called play on, Maloney got up, scored, and we went on to win.

When you find them, point them out to me & everyone else on here.

And again "Do you really think we were more than twice as ill disciplined as lol@souffs.??"

[Guest]

Now im beginning to understand why you are the most despised person on here
Why do you resort to name calling ?
Wtf does liverrabbit even mean ?lol
If you thinks its a penalty why say it should have been a play the ball ?

name calling? 1971 = last time souffs won a premiership, it was just the first thing that came to my mind.
I said I accept that it was a penalty because that is the rule, I that said that they should change the rule, in my opinion.
understand?

[roostersrule2]

we always notice the 50/50 calls that go against us, but what about the 50/50 calls that go our way?
Before Maloney's second try, he was technically tackle as he had his elbow on the ground and a souths player had his hand on him simultaneously, that constitutes a tackle, but the ref called play on, Maloney got up, scored, and we went on to win.

What about Inglis holding him down after his break? Was that a penalty?

[Guest]

When you find them, point them out to me & everyone else on here.

And again "Do you really think we were more than twice as ill disciplined as lol@souffs.??"

will do.
and yes, we did give away 3 or 4 high tackle penalties, I cant remember the others, I might have to give it another watch.

[Guest]

What about Inglis holding him down after his break? Was that a penalty?

no I actually thought that was well timed. Maloney could have milked it by falling over again but he didn't, credit to him, and we got the try a few plays later.

[kurtsherlock6]

we always notice the 50/50 calls that go against us, but what about the 50/50 calls that go our way?
Before Maloney's second try, he was technically tackle as he had his elbow on the ground and a souths player had his hand on him simultaneously, that constitutes a tackle, but the ref called play on, Maloney got up, scored, and we went on to win.

All the commentators agreed that it was a try & not 1 souffs player really questioned this decision which would suggest it wasnt a 50/50 call.

[Guest]

All the commentators agreed that it was a try & not 1 souffs player really questioned this decision which would suggest it wasnt a 50/50 call.

I think it is. do we only play by the rules when it suits us? it was technically a tackle, everyone missed it, because it was very touch an go, but it was a 50/50 decision that went our way. the ref could've easily yelled out held, and Maloney doesn't score.

[kurtsherlock6]

will do.
and yes, we did give away 3 or 4 high tackle penalties, I cant remember the others, I might have to give it another watch.

What about several high tackles on our players, the ones on Maloney & Mini spring to mind, that went unpenalised.

And one more time, Do you really think we were more than twice as ill disciplined as lol@souffs.??

[roostersrule2]

no I actually thought that was well timed. Maloney could have milked it by falling over again but he didn't, credit to him, and we got the try a few plays later.

Are you Cecchin's mistress? He held him down longer and was pushing his head into the ground, if that's not a penalty nothing is.

[Guest]

What about several high tackles on our players, the ones on Maloney & Mini spring to mind, that went unpenalised.

And one more time, Do you really think we were more than twice as ill disciplined as lol@souffs.??

I'm not sure which tackles you are referring to specifically
and I answered your question when I said and yes, we did give away 3 or 4...

[Guest]

Are you Cecchin's mistress? He held him down longer and was pushing his head into the ground, if that's not a penalty nothing is.

he wasn't pushing his head into the ground, he had him by the back of the jersey and was holding him down.
for fark sake if you want to complain about something, watching inglis walk 2 metres off the mark every time he plays the ball kills me.

[kurtsherlock6]

I think it is. do we only play by the rules when it suits us? it was technically a tackle, everyone missed it, because it was very touch an go, but it was a 50/50 decision that went our way. the ref could've easily yelled out held, and Maloney doesn't score.

Nobody missed it, it was shown several times on replay & it was agreed by all it was a try. As i said before, not even the souffs players complained but i suppose they probably wernt watching the play

[kurtsherlock6]

I'm not sure which tackles you are referring to specifically
and I answered your question when I said and yes, we did give away 3 or 4...

So you think we were more than twice as ill discplined as souffs. Fark me i give up.

[roostersrule2]

he wasn't pushing his head into the ground, he had him by the back of the jersey and was holding him down.
for fark sake if you want to complain about something, watching inglis walk 2 metres off the mark every time he plays the ball kills me.

He had the jersey on his head/neck and does walking off the mark even get policed anymore? I haven't seen a penalty for it all year and it happens in every game.