Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Red Bandana Wearing Wanka

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    And Paddo, EVERYTHING you write is "as though it is the last word".

    Is Xi Jinping a "progressive thinker"?

    Comment


    • #77
      Pretty much what I'd expect from 1908, a thoughtful, reasoned response more or less along the same lines as the Foxsports article on The Bandanna.

      And Player, TR's comments on PFS were reasoned and complimentary in part. He said that the Bandanna had done valuable work in raising awareness of concussion in contact sport. What concerned him was the imputation that Easts were negligent. I can't read "wanker" into that anywhere. What I can see is your Tele driven bias.
      Do I think Xi Jinping "progressive"? I think that he heads a system that could be described as being that. China has always had its best and brightest administering the Nation and the same is as true in this age as it was in Dynastic Confucian times. But you would need to know some Chinese history to appreciate that. Might, possibly, be your first ever book?

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Paddo Colt 61 View Post
        Pretty much what I'd expect from 1908, a thoughtful, reasoned response more or less along the same lines as the Foxsports article on The Bandanna.

        And Player, TR's comments on PFS were reasoned and complimentary in part. He said that the Bandanna had done valuable work in raising awareness of concussion in contact sport. What concerned him was the imputation that Easts were negligent. I can't read "wanker" into that anywhere. What I can see is your Tele driven bias.
        Do I think Xi Jinping "progressive"? I think that he heads a system that could be described as being that. China has always had its best and brightest administering the Nation and the same is as true in this age as it was in Dynastic Confucian times. But you would need to know some Chinese history to appreciate that. Might, possibly, be your first ever book?
        Hey Paddo, as someone who's never read a book (except the Tele), I'm disappointed your OCD didn't compel you to comment on the observation that indeed EVERYTHING you write is "as though it is the last word".

        You're right about China. I'm so jealous I don't live there. And their repression of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang is some of their best and brightest's finest work.

        Comment


        • #79
          I simply write my opinion and I try to argue it. Ya see, name calling doesn't cut it, that's the Tele's go. That, and never appeal to reason emotions trump it every day of the week.

          The Uyghurs are an emotional propaganda case in point. They are a muslim ethic population, sections of which signed on to the Calaphate big time. Elements are still fighting in Syria with ISIS. Their end game is an independent Islamic State - East Turkestan. Furthermore, the East Turkestan movement has been proscribed by the UN Security Council as a Terrorist organisation which has attacked the Chinese State several times. Osama was a regular visitor urging jehad against the "Chinese Infidels". The US was a signatory to the listing. The Uyghurs are not all in camps, there are millions of them, but those found to be associated with East Turkestan certainly are. Peter Dutton must have wet dreams about such a situation here. Morrison won't even agree to repatriate the wives and children of the Aussie jehadis still living in sqalid camps in Kurd territory, how might we react with a Uygher type minority living here?
          Now all of this is fact and it came from research that I, knowing nothing about the Uyghurs, undertook because of what I saw coming from News Corp which, clearly, is a cynical, low rent, warmongering, lying, reactionary outfit that controls 70% of media in this country. Your children and grand children are going to have to fight in any future conflict if you let yourself be gulled by that lot.

          Comment


          • #80
            maybe time to take some of this stuff to the off topic forum

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Paddo Colt 61 View Post
              I simply write my opinion and I try to argue it. Ya see, name calling doesn't cut it, that's the Tele's go. That, and never appeal to reason emotions trump it every day of the week.

              The Uyghurs are an emotional propaganda case in point. They are a muslim ethic population, sections of which signed on to the Calaphate big time. Elements are still fighting in Syria with ISIS. Their end game is an independent Islamic State - East Turkestan. Furthermore, the East Turkestan movement has been proscribed by the UN Security Council as a Terrorist organisation which has attacked the Chinese State several times. Osama was a regular visitor urging jehad against the "Chinese Infidels". The US was a signatory to the listing. The Uyghurs are not all in camps, there are millions of them, but those found to be associated with East Turkestan certainly are. Peter Dutton must have wet dreams about such a situation here. Morrison won't even agree to repatriate the wives and children of the Aussie jehadis still living in sqalid camps in Kurd territory, how might we react with a Uygher type minority living here?
              Now all of this is fact and it came from research that I, knowing nothing about the Uyghurs, undertook because of what I saw coming from News Corp which, clearly, is a cynical, low rent, warmongering, lying, reactionary outfit that controls 70% of media in this country. Your children and grand children are going to have to fight in any future conflict if you let yourself be gulled by that lot.
              Cool story.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Paddo Colt 61 View Post
                Pretty much what I'd expect from 1908, a thoughtful, reasoned response more or less along the same lines as the Foxsports article on The Bandanna.

                And Player, TR's comments on PFS were reasoned and complimentary in part. He said that the Bandanna had done valuable work in raising awareness of concussion in contact sport. What concerned him was the imputation that Easts were negligent. I can't read "wanker" into that anywhere. What I can see is your Tele driven bias.
                Do I think Xi Jinping "progressive"? I think that he heads a system that could be described as being that. China has always had its best and brightest administering the Nation and the same is as true in this age as it was in Dynastic Confucian times. But you would need to know some Chinese history to appreciate that. Might, possibly, be your first ever book?
                Pado just because you can write big words and talk dribble doesn't make you right , just self righteous , you put down everything everyone says that you don't agree with, . Your not into debating an issue your just into belittling others that don't agree with you .Maybe if you took the time to listen to everyday people instead of the conspiracy mob you read into you may be a bit more understanding that others have opinions that differ to yours ,

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Larry Long Balls View Post
                  I don't really want to mention the guy's name but who saw his idiotic article slamming the coverage SBW got. I admit it was a little over the top but this guy takes every shot he can at anything to with the NRL. He is a poor excuse for a sports journo.
                  He’s a male feminist, as Mr Bill Burr once said, it’s the most pathetic attempt to get laid, the ones that scream the loudest that have the most to hide.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Good old Paddo colt 61. The most insecure poster on the this place. Always trying to prove he is smarter that everyone else and reminding himself of his insecurity though a veil of self rightousness.
                    Me I don't care who you vote for or what RL team you support if you are a dick you are a dick. I think your forum name and logo are apt because like the colts you are a dickhead and like the colts you sound more like a bad souths supporter. Just like the scum bag Colts were when they ditched the Roosters.

                    Unfortunately not every thing is about left or right or new corp v the world. Fitzsimmons and his wife are ****wits regardless of who they work for or vote for. Yes its they are lucky to get paid ofr being dickheads, more so him than her. But that doesn't excuse it nor validate it.

                    So condemn me all you want for what news yous assume I might pay attention to, what TV shows you presume I like or what political party you think you know I support. None of that matters, you are a sad sorry little jerk

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by OMR View Post
                      Arabic, which is a challenge by itself as there are a multitude of dialects from the different countries in the Middle East and North Africa, but they all come under the umbrella of Arabic.
                      I'll bet you're a busy man

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        It's not conspiracy stuff, spare me that. Didn't you read that there is a UNSC listing and an East Turkestan Terrorist organisation? Those are facts.
                        If anything I try to use some factual shock treatment when I see, let's be honest, uninformed opinion(apart from the tele's influence). It's not a put down, it's argument or rebuttal of the group think that "ordinary people" are, unfortunately, suckered into especially when an old warmongering toad controls a near media monopoly.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          How actually do you know this is fact .Is it just because you read it or heard it on the dark web, or the ABC or wherever.Im guessing 9/11 was organised by western governments. The moon landing was fake and the corona virus didn't actually start in China . I'm not saying your wrong , because I respect you right to your opinion , but what I am saying is I definitely don't agree with it .

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Please 1908, if it's a resolution of the UNSC it's a fact (Google UNSC resolutions Uyghurs). You're in Trump territory now. I know that it is difficult to change opinion because most people go with what they understand, what suits their prejudices or interests and often with the first opinion they hear as Thucydides observed way back.

                            Zac please note. This thread was never about football.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Hey Paddo Colt, I'm not sure what you are doing here on this forum.
                              Firstly, you are obviously a Souffs supporter, and this forum is the Chookpen (for Easts supporters)
                              Secondly, all your posts make it obvious that you support Fitzsimons and you have the same left wing, socialist bent as him, you went to university, and you think you are superior to everyone else with your pseudo-intellectual comments and vocabulary.
                              I went to University too, and I was lectured by lots of left- wing tools, tutors and lecturers. Luckily, I wasn't brainwashed by them, like you are.
                              Thirdly, the demographic of the Eastern Suburbs indicates that is the wealth belt, and its inhabitants are generally well off , and in politics, support the right - the opposite to you.
                              I make no secret that I support the right, I am a Capitalist, an Easts Supporter, I live in Roosters heartland, and proud of what I believe in, what I have done in life, and what I stand for - almost all are opposite to you.
                              This is a football forum, not a political one, so it should be kept in that context. If you don't support the Roosters, or don't have something constructive to say about our team, get lost , because you are only here to incite trouble.
                              And lastly, if you want to go toe- to- toe on politics , bring it on. I won't back down, and there are numerous examples of how the socialist agenda and ideologies have failed, and f*cked up this country, big time.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by roostermcgregor View Post
                                Hey Paddo Colt, I'm not sure what you are doing here on this forum.
                                Firstly, you are obviously a Souffs supporter, and this forum is the Chookpen (for Easts supporters)
                                I'm not getting into the politics. And agree that Paddo Colt needs to give the non footy related posts a rest.... but colours aside, I think Paddo sounds a little too intelligent to be a Souffs fan. I mean there's no way that a Souffs fan would know that Thucydides was an Athenian historian let alone be able to quote him.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X